Technology

Modern AI is system-limited, not model-limited

Radium removes the abstraction layers that slow every other cloud down. At the kernel, orchestration, and network level. So you get closer to peak hardware performance than anywhere else.

2x
Lower inference
latency vs AWS
Carnegie Mellon University
 Up to
50%
Faster training vs GCP
Stanford CRFM
Linear
Multi-node scaling up to 64 GPUs
Stanford University
the problem

Every other cloud adds layers. We take them away

Hyperscalers and neo clouds bolt inference on top of a virtualization stack built for general compute. That means your GPU is always fighting with a hypervisor, an overlay network, and a scheduler that has no idea what an AI workload even is.

Radium was built from the ground up with AI workloads as the primary design constraint.

RadiumDeploy —
Inference API
AI/ML Frameworks +
Intelligent Orchestration
Zero-Virtualization Kernel
(Optimized OS)
Software-Defined
Network Fabric
Vendor-Agnostic
Physical Infrastructure

The cost of abstraction compounds with model complexity.

As models get deeper and workloads get heavier, every layer of generalization you're running on top of becomes more expensive. That's why our performance advantage grows with model size — not shrinks.

Radium owns every interface between layers — that's where performance is won or lost.

Try Radium
Model transparency

Built on the best open-source models. Delivered through infrastructure only Radium can provide

Each Radium model is powered by leading open-source foundations, optimized through our proprietary orchestration, kernel, and network stack to deliver up to [X]% lower cost at equivalent quality. We select and update base models continuously to ensure you always run the best available architecture.

Our Technology
How It Works

Three levels of optimization.
One integrated stack.

Performance isn't won at any single layer. Radium optimizes across all three simultaneously — and they compound.

1.

Intelligent
Orchestration

Most schedulers treat everything as generic batch workloads. Radium's RL-based orchestration engine knows the difference between training, fine-tuning, and inference — and optimizes for each one's distinct performance profile.

Workload-aware scheduling — not
just "first available GPU"

Topology-aware placement across
NUMA, SXM, PCIe, and fabric

Auto-scaling that stays network- and
latency-aware

Closed-loop control using live system
telemetry

2.

Kernel-Level
Optimization

The Linux kernel is designed to be fair to all workloads. That's exactly the wrong design for AI. Radium's kernel is tuned to bias toward locality, predictability, and throughput for GPU workloads — not fairness.

CPU affinity and thread pinning
aligned to NUMA topology

Interrupt routing to minimize cross-
socket latency

Large memory allocation local to the
GPU consuming it

Deterministic scheduling to eliminate
jitter spikes

3.

Network-Level
Optimization

Radium treats networking as a first-class component — not a layer managed by someone else's CNI plugin. Custom routing logic, purpose-built DNS/DHCP, and a dual-fabric architecture separating AI traffic from control/storage.

InfiniBand for AI training traffic,
Ethernet for control/storage

Custom software on switches —
topology and congestion-aware routing

Proprietary DNS and DHCP for
deterministic startup/teardown

Multi-datacenter fabric bridging
without performance cliff

Independent Benchmarks

Third-party validated. Real workloads, not microbenchmarks.

2x
Lower inference
latency vs AWS

Training & Inference
Under Mixed Load

Benchmarked at

CMU ran a variational autoencoder on concurrent CPU+GPU workloads.

On AWS, interrupt and scheduling noise caused latency spikes as virtualization layers compounded.

On Radium: stable, fast, predictable. Same hardware class, comparable price point.

30%
Higher MFU on
identical JAX|
workloads vs GCP

Model FLOP
Utilization vs GCP

Benchmarked at

Stanford's Center for Research on Foundation Models ran GPT2-XL training on the same software stack, same hardware generation, across both clouds.

Radium consistently reached 50–55% MFU. GCP plateaued at 39–45%.

Radium also outperformed Stanford's own on-premises HPC cluster.

58%
Better utilization at
16-layer depth vs
AWS

Performance
Advantage Scales
With Model Depth

Benchmarked at

At 4 layers: 30% advantage. At 16 layers: 58% advantage. The performance gap compounds as models get deeper — more kernel launches, more memory movement, more synchronization.

Radium's optimizations handle exactly these operations better than a generic virtualized environment.

How We Compare


Built different.
Not just deployed different.

The gap isn't configuration — it's architecture. Here's what changes when you build a cloud around AI from day one.

Model mapping

The same workloads, at a lower cost to operate

Radium models align with familiar performance tiers, but are delivered through infrastructure designed to reduce the cost of running them in production.

Switching from OpenAI or Anthropic

Radium

Open Source

(Kubernetes / OpenStack)

Hyperscalers

(AWS / GCP / Azure)
Execution Model
Bare-metal, virtualization - free
Containers / VMs on hypervisors
VMs with managed overlays
Scheduling Awareness
GPU, NUMA, fabric, and power-aware
Primarily CPU/memory 
aware
VM-level scheduling
Networking Model
Custom routing, DNS, DHCP, dual-fabric
Overlay networking 
(CNI, Neutron)
VPC overlays
Performance Under Contention
Stable and predictable
Degrades under mixed workloads
Noisy-neighbor effects common
Hardware Differentiation
Architecture-specific optimizations exposed
Limited by abstractions
Limited by provider roadmap
New Hardware Integration
Weeks (platform-driven)
Months (multi-layer enablement)
Quarters+ (provider-driven)
Feedback Loop to Hardware
Direct and iterative
Fragmented
Minimal
Get Started

One line of code to switch.
A different class of performance.

Swap OpenAI for Radium in your API call. That's it.